Another thought provoking Noon Tide Query by Troythulu: “What doctrine or belief system do you consider to be the most disturbing? The most dangerous?”
Both disturbing and dangerous are folks who think we’re at the end of history–we know it all!
They think “X” can’t exist because science says it can’t (or religion says it can’t–take your pick). Each epoch thinks they’re at the end of history and each time they’ve been wrong. There have been at least 5 scientific paradigms since ancient Greece, and the final conclusions of each one have eventually been shown to be incomplete. Not necessarily false, although in many cases they have, but at the very least incomplete. In the beginning of the 20th century, most scientists were UTTERLY CONVINCED materialism was true. By 1950 almost no physicist believed it. Not only do we now know about the conceptual problems with materialism, but the logical problems alone sent the materialists packing. Speaking of logic, rather than suspend judgment about something which is logically possible (God, teleportation, etc.), closed-minded people using the flavor-of-the-month epistemological and ontological view, claim to know “X” it’s not possible. Why? Blind faith. For example, most physicists of the 1950’s and 1960’s were totally against the existence of quarks because their limited view of science told them “nothing could be smaller than a proton.” A broader view of science dictated otherwise, nay, LOGIC itself dictated otherwise, and finally by the mid-1970’s most scientists were on board with quarks. But for 20 years denial ruled the day because people thought they knew it all–they thought they were at the end of history and that we had it all wrapped up. Think again, Feynman, et al!!! (Feynman was BRILLIANT, don’t get me wrong, but history proved his earlier view to be completely in error because he refused to open his mind to wider possibilities.)
Put differently, if you think “X” is impossible, then wait. Maybe 50 years, maybe 500, but sooner or later our understanding of reality will grow to the point where “X” is shown. Again, as long as it’s logical. E.g., an all-good, omnipotent God is illogical, so it’s useless to posit it. But that doesn’t mean God isn’t possible, of course. Like Shawn says on the TV program “Psyche” … Wait For It….. Wait For It…… !!!